This talk is brought to you by the Thomistic Institute.

For more talks like this, visit us at tamisticinstitute.org.

In 2015, the geneticist Jerry Coyne published a book titled Faith versus Fact, why science and religion are incompatible.

And he commented on the book in an interview in the National Geographic later on, and he said this,

if you teach evolution, as he does, you're teaching the one form of science that hits Abrahamic religions in the solar

plexus. There are a number of things about evolution and science that undermine religion. First of all,

the fact that the Genesis story is wrong.

There's no evidence that there's any qualitative different between humans and other species.

We're not special products of God's creation.

We're learning a lot about the universe and what we're seeing is all a naturalistic

process. We are creatures of physics made of molecules. Therefore, our thoughts and behaviors

are also the results of molecular motions. One of the meanings of superstition in the Oxford

English Dictionary is a belief that is unfounded or irrational.

Since I see all religious belief as unfounded and irrational, I consider religion to be superstition.

Well, his words suggest that science and religion may not always be on the best of terms.

They're not only incompatible, but they are themes even openly hostile to each other.

Something like a punch in the solar plexus, he says. In his book, he uses the word war

to describe the relationship. He says, I maintain that religion and science are engaged in a kind of war,

a war for understanding, a war about whether we have or should have good reasons for what we

accept as true. Now the idea of a war between science and religion is nothing new. It goes

back at least to the 19th century marked by the publication of two books. One was the history

of the conflict between religion and science

...