All right, I see the guest is in the back chat here.

Oh, yes, yes.

The Misfit page, I don't know what his name is.

I know maybe I should know what his name is.

I'm going to ask him first, things first. Misfit, I'm going to bring you in. We're going to start on YouTube, and then we're going to end it and go over to Rumble, and then I'll post this entire thing to YouTube afterwards. bringing you in three two one hey what's it's Zach by the way Zach is your last name known as

well bonfileo yeah yeah oh i've been i've been i've bringing you in three to one hey what's it's Zach by the way Zach is your last name known as

well bonfillo yeah yeah oh I've been I've been doxed more than anybody on the internet I was

doxed yesterday well you're locks if your name is out there because then it's already out

there don't yeah no it's public public information um real quick I just wanted to

bonfilio Italian means good son. Just real quick, before we get started, I wanted to say something about the Ian Carroll thing. I think that you covered it very fairly. I think I've heard... I know people who know Ian. I've heard he's a really nice guy. I really don't have a problem personally with him. The problem I have with him and

others is something you asked what the problem is with him. Facts without context is propaganda,

and conclusions based on facts without context is conspiracy theory. What Ian does, you said,

did he say anything unfactual? No. He just doesn't provide the context. For instance, the Rothschilds, he calls, you know, the Zionist propaganda, the Ross Childs funded this and funded that. The Ross Childs didn't necessarily fund anything. They didn't fund the founding of Israel. Theodore Herzl, who was the father of modern Zionism, there's this conspiracy theory that the Ross Childs worked with him.

And if you go back and verify it, then they actually weren't.

So when you're asking people that can contest him, there are plenty of people that can contest him.

He's gaining a lot of credibility.

And again, I don't want to go down his road and say conspiracy theory.

But his engagement is, let's say, not normal, if that makes sense. So the same

arguments that he makes about just asking questions, I could ask the same questions as to why

a post of his that gets, you know, a million views will gain him 100,000 followers,

and a post of mine that gains 10 million views will gain me about 2,000. So we're not going to go down that road. What I'm saying is... I got to stop you at least in some point. I want to come back to the facts without context as propaganda because that becomes the argument for everybody who wants to say, you didn't give all the context. So you gave some stuff. You don't have to give all of it. You just have to.

But I'm sorry, facts without context almost seems, I don't want to say it sounds like an oxymor because a fact you would think does not need the context. I'll give you, I'll give you an example if this helps, right? Facts without context. Epstein has ties to Mossad, fact, okay? Epstein's ties to Assad. Fact. Okay. Epstein's ties to Assad is from the previous

...