The judge even went on later on to say, if you leave like blood or fingerprints at a crime scene,

you're the criminally now you're running away, you're in hiding.

You have no right to privacy in what you leave at a crime scene, your fingerprints,

your DNA, or footprint, whatever.

You have no right to privacy in that whatsoever.

So therefore, the whole thing, it's a great argument by Ann Taylor.

She is trying her hardest.

She is doing everything.

She's required to do.

She is, you know, zealously advocating for her client.

So he is actually getting excellent, you know, reprient. is zealously advocating for her client.

So he is actually getting excellent, you know, legal representation in this case.

But in the end, she knows that, you know, she's got to know this is probably not going to go anywhere,

but she's doing the best she can.

But he has no expectations of privacy. In that crime scene, he has no expectations of privacy, as a judge was talking about,

in a search of someone else's DNA database, none whatsoever.

Truthseeker from the chat, how did the DNA double in size after the FBI received it?

There are techniques where the DNA, the sample, can be replicated to make the sample larger.

And that's the most simple way I can explain it to you.

I can't explain it in the scientific terms.

But I believe it's through polymerase chain reaction.

They're able to expand the DNA from the sample, just make the sample larger using

...