Affirmative Action Ruled Unconstitutional by U.S. Supreme Court: Superficial v. Substantive Diversity | SYSTEM UPDATE #108
System Update with Glenn Greenwald
Rumble
4.7 • 1.2K Ratings
🗓️ 30 June 2023
⏱️ 85 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Watch full episodes on Rumble, streamed LIVE 7pm ET: https://rumble.com/c/GGreenwald
Become part of our Locals community: https://greenwald.locals.com/
- - -
Follow Glenn:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ggreenwald
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glenn.11.greenwald/
Follow System Update:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SystemUpdate_
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/systemupdate__/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@systemupdate__
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/systemupdate.tv/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/systemupdate/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | And the Good evening. It's Thursday, June 29th. Welcome to a new episode of |
| 0:18.8 | System Update. Our live nightly show that airs every Monday through Friday at 7 p.m. Eastern exclusively |
| 0:24.6 | here on Rumble the free speech alternative to YouTube. Tonight in a landmark |
| 0:28.9 | ruling with implications far beyond the specific case the US Supreme Court today struck down the use of |
| 0:34.8 | race as a factor in the admissions process of both Harvard and the University of |
| 0:39.6 | North Carolina. In a 6-3 ruling, the court held that holding a person's race against them when deciding who is and is not admitted to universities violates the right of equal protection guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. |
| 0:53.9 | In some, the practice long known as affirmative action whose advocates have long claimed is necessary |
| 1:00.0 | to combat racial discrimination is now finally classified by the court as |
| 1:04.9 | itself a pernicious form of racial discrimination. The type of prejudice |
| 1:08.8 | the 14th Amendment was enacted to combat. The principles enshrined in today's ruling extend far beyond |
| 1:14.9 | the university setting. The use of race-based preferences of this kind has become |
| 1:18.2 | pervasive in the US. They are used in the hiring process by the largest |
| 1:22.3 | corporations and by state and federal government agencies in determining which citizens are and are not eligible for a wide array of benefits. |
| 1:31.0 | We will examine the ruling, its key consequences, and most of all, these two pressing questions. |
| 1:36.6 | First, does the color of a person's skin determine the type of experiences and perspectives they should be expected to bring to an academic |
| 1:46.5 | institution a job or a political conversation? |
| 1:50.0 | Or is that merely just a type of superficial diversity |
| 1:53.2 | weaponized by the nation's most powerful institutions |
| 1:55.8 | to avoid and even prevent real diversity of thought |
| 1:58.5 | and experience. |
| 2:00.4 | And then secondly, can the assumption that a person's race determines their thoughts and experiences ever be anything more than the type of crude, primitive, and offensive stereotyping, which its defenders claim to oppose. |
| 2:14.2 | As we do every Tuesday and Thursday, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Rumble, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Rumble and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

