I know you said at owners meetings that you didn't anticipate a ton of trades,

because you always need somebody to move up and there's not that same level of

quarterback class this year. Do you anticipate picking at seven at this point?

Yeah, certainly I have to be ready to do that. I would say more likely than not that would happen, but you never know.

You never know who's, and it'll depend on who's on the board if a team wants to move up, you know,

and then we have to decide if we want to do that. But I would say more likely than not we'd stay in pick,

but, you know, I don't foresee us moving up,

but, you know, moving back just depends on the circumstances, but we're not like, I want to

say we're not actively trying to move back. You know, we're always assessing our options and

making sure we're ready and then understanding who's going to be there at certain positions

and certain spots, you know, towards the middle

to the later part of the first round. And just being prepared for that, but not really actively

trying to get out of that at all. Yeah, I mean, the chances are higher than lower that they're

going to pick at seven. You know, that's just, that's what'll likely happen, that they will end up sticking at seven.

Trades don't happen more often than, you know, they don't.

They don't happen more often than they do, is a better way of saying it.

And I think that the odds favor that they'll end up taking a player at seven.

My preference here one week after they would have picked on Thursday night is a trade back

unless David Bailey falls to seven or Rubin Bain is a player that I just think is so dominant or was so dominant as a college player

that if they tell me, or if they don't care about the short arms, then I'm not going to care about the short arms.

I mentioned a little while ago that there was a player that I, you know, in a tradeback scenario, say to 16 or 17,

there's a player that I actually would really like.

...