4.8 • 853 Ratings
🗓️ 18 February 2020
⏱️ 49 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
How did String Theory get started? What has made the idea so popular over the decades? Can we ever truly have a theory of quantum gravity? What is supersymmetry, the landscape, and the AdS/CFT Correspondence? What do holograms have to do with this? How many dimensions do we live in? Why does String Theory have such a hard time making predictions? How are we supposed to judge a theory that isn’t done yet? It’s a non-stop String Theory bonanza as I discuss these questions and more in today’s Ask a Spaceman!
Support the show: http://www.patreon.com/pmsutter
All episodes: http://www.AskASpaceman.com
Follow on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/PaulMattSutter
Like on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/PaulMattSutter
Watch on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/PaulMSutter
Read a book: http://www.pmsutter/book
Go on an adventure: http://www.AstroTours.co
Keep those questions about space, science, astronomy, astrophysics, physics, and cosmology coming to #AskASpaceman for COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE OF TIME AND SPACE!
Big thanks to my top Patreon supporters this month: Matthew K, Justin Z, Justin G, Kevin O, Duncan M, Corey D, Barbara K, Neuterdude, Chris C, Robert M, Nate H, Andrew F, Chris L, Jon, Cameron L, Nalia, Aaron S, Kirk T, Tim R, Joe R, Neil P, Bryan D, Irene P, Dustin R, Matt C, Iothian53, Steve P, Debra S, Ken L, Alberto M, Ron W, Chris L, Mark R, Alan B, Stephen J, David P, John F, Maureen R, Frank T, Craig B, Jesse A, Steven L, Ulfert B, Dave L, Stace J, S Stark, Richard K, Carol S, Stephen M, Grace M, Jeremy K, Russell W, David B, Tamara F, Robert B, Fr Bruce W, Catherine R, Nicolai B, Sean M, Nate H, Edward K, Ped, Chuck C, Jose Pablo V, Stephen S, Elizabeth W, Eric F, Tracy F, Roger G, Callan R, Nils M, John W, George, Tom G, Monika, Michael H, Tom, Sarah K, and Robert S!
Music by Jason Grady and Nick Bain. Thanks to Cathy Rinella for editing.
Hosted by Paul M. Sutter, astrophysicist and the one and only Agent to the Stars (http://www.pmsutter.com).
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Perhaps the worst insult you can possibly give a physicist |
0:14.0 | when they present their idea is attributed to none other than Wolfgang Polly. |
0:21.8 | He's one of the greats when it comes to quantum mechanics, |
0:26.0 | and I'm sure we'll talk about him more someday. |
0:29.2 | We met him in the last episode |
0:31.9 | when his response to conformal field theories was to say, |
0:36.4 | shut up. |
0:41.4 | And there are a few stories of when listening to a colleague or reading a paper, and I can totally see this. You present your ID, you say it to him. |
0:47.7 | And, you know, Wolfgang Polly is he's Polly. You want his opinion. You want his approval. So you're |
0:52.3 | like, hey, you shoot some idea at him. |
0:55.3 | And he simply sighs, shakes his head sadly and says, this is not even wrong. |
1:03.3 | The point of science is to generate theories that are testable. |
1:08.8 | Not even wrong means that the idea is so far beyond reasonable science that it can't |
1:16.6 | even be tested. It's nonsense. It's non-verifiable. A testable but wrong theory is preferable to this. |
1:25.6 | At least if your theory is wrong, |
1:28.2 | at least you're still doing science. |
1:31.8 | And that's one possible benchmark |
1:33.4 | to use to evaluate string theory. |
1:36.4 | Is it even good enough to be wrong? |
1:41.3 | As you can imagine, this is a somewhat contentious subject, and so we've spent the past few |
1:47.3 | months exploring string theory. |
1:51.0 | I mean, give yourself a pat on the back for slogging through S matrix and conformal |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Paul M. Sutter, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Paul M. Sutter and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.