From the New York Times, I'm Sabrina Tarnese, and this is The Daily.

On Friday, the Supreme Court delivered another major decision on the last day of its term,

ruling in favor of a web designer who argued that having to create websites for same-sex

marriages violated her right to free speech.

Today, my colleague Adam Liptack on how the ruling puts freedom of expression above freedom

from discrimination, and what that might mean for all kinds of different groups of Americans.

It's Monday, July 3rd.

Adam, you're back.

Hello, Sabrina.

So this time you're here for another major case, one potentially with far-reaching consequences

for same-sex couples.

Tell me about the ruling.

So, this is the end of June when we get the big cases, and this is one we've been waiting

for for many months.

The question is whether a website designer with religious convictions can refuse to provide

services to same-sex couples for same-sex marriages.

And the court by the usual 6-3 split with the six Republican appointees in the majority

says, yes, she can.

She has a first amendment free speech right, not to be compelled by the government to say

things she doesn't believe.

She says that same-sex marriages are false, and that in having to comply with a Colorado

anti-discrimination law that forbids discrimination on many grounds, including sexual orientation,

...