Hi everybody, this is Gatsad. I'd like to spend a few minutes offering you a quick primer on history.

Here we go. You ready? There's a river. On each side of the river, there's a tribe. Tribe A looks at all the resources of Tribe B with envy and it covets them.

Same exact machinations are taking place from the perspective of Tribe B looking at the

resources of Tribe A.

And the men of each tribe has to engage in the following calculation in deciding whether it makes

sense for them to go ahead and attack the other one.

Would we be able to attack them and take that which we covet?

If yes, go for it.

If not, best wait until the time is opportune for us to do so.

The reason why neither tribe consistently goes to war with the other one is because each of the

two tribes knows that they are violent and aggressive men that would not take well to the members of the other tribe coming after them.

Now imagine that you have a first time to ever see reality, whereby the members of tribe B have convinced

all the members of their society that nothing could be more laudable than to

never respond in any survival instinctual way, irrespective of what Tribe A does.

If Tribe A comes to steal your children and rape them,

it's better not to attack them because that would be phobic. They want to rape your women.

Don't attack them because it's phobic. They want to take over your society. Don't fight back because it'll be phobic.

They wish to urinate on your culture, your heritage, your religion,

your civilization. Don't fight back because that would be phobic. From the perspective of

tribe B, nothing is more objectionable than to invoke your sense of survival instinct in protecting your women,

your children, your civilization, your accomplishments, your heritage, your religion, your culture.

It doesn't end up too well for the members of Tribe B.

...