meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Lingthusiasm - A podcast that's enthusiastic about linguistics

94: The perfectly imperfect aspect episode

Lingthusiasm - A podcast that's enthusiastic about linguistics

Gretchen McCulloch and Lauren Gawne

Science

4.8743 Ratings

🗓️ 19 July 2024

⏱️ 39 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

When we're talking about an activity -- say, throwing teacups in a lake -- we often want to know not just when the action takes place, but also what shape that action looks like. Is this a one-time teacup throwing event (I threw the teacup in the lake) or a repeated or ongoing situation (I was throwing the teacup in the lake)? Both of these actions might have happened at the same time (they're both in the past tense), but this different in shape between them is known as aspect. In this episode, your hosts Gretchen McCulloch and Lauren Gawne get enthusiastic about aspect. We talk about the important aspects of aspect: the most common aspectual meaning across languages (whether an action is completed or not) and the most common ways of forming aspects (repeating some or all of the word, or else grabbing something from somewhere else in the grammar), as well as why English aspect in the present tense went weird a couple centuries ago (Shakespeare could say "I go, my lord" but these days we're far more likely to say "I'm going"). We also talk about our favourite fun aspects of aspect: why there isn't a Thursdititive aspect even though it would be super useful for a certain linguistics podcast (ahem!), the secret etymological frequentative aspect that's hiding in plain sight in English, and the real historical teacup-lake-throwing controversy that could have been solved with more precise use of aspect. Announcements: In this month’s bonus episode we get enthusiastic about ways of comparing things to each other! We talk about why comparisons get weird when the groups are too large or too small, the hidden etymological connection between more and most, how we choose between er/est and more/most (and why "funner" is really more logical), and how English has more ways of making comparatives than many other languages. We also talk about strategies that other languages use for making comparatives, and why some words are harder to make comparative. Listen to the episode here: patreon.com/posts/107428007 Join us on Patreon now to get access to this and 80+ other bonus episodes. You’ll also get access to the Lingthusiasm Discord server where you can chat with other language nerds. All this and more at patreon.com/lingthusiasm Read the transcript here: lingthusiasm.com/post/756390436883546112/transcript-episode-94-aspect For links to things mentioned in this episode: lingthusiasm.com/post/756390309859098624/lingthusiasm-episode-94-the-perfectly-imperfect

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Lingthusiasm, a podcast that's enthusiastic about linguistics. I'm Gretchen

0:24.3

McCulloch. And I'm Lauren Gorn, and today we're getting enthusiastic about Aspect. But first,

0:30.3

our most recent bonus episode was about comparatives and superlatives. Would you say that it's a good

0:35.5

episode? It's definitely one of our better episodes on

0:38.5

this topic. In fact, it's the first time we've done an episode on superlatives, so it's the best.

0:45.6

It's the only time, so we've made sure that it's superlative in the linguistic and non-linguistic sense.

0:50.6

To listen to the comparative and superlatives episode, and over seven years of monthly bonus episodes, go to patreon.com slash linkthesiasm. One of my favorite linguistic craft projects was when I embroidered the international phonetic alphabet.

1:17.2

I remember that project. You put photos of it on your blog. I love when people make linguistics

1:22.3

crafts and share photos of them or bring them to conferences. It's so much fun. Yeah, I had already

1:27.1

embroidered the IPA when we started much fun. Yeah, I had already embroidered the

1:27.7

IPA when we started this podcast. And while I was embroidering the IPA, I really enjoyed thinking

1:33.5

about each of the sounds while I was embroidering it. And then since I embroidered the IPA all in a

1:39.1

single weekend, it was sort of an impulse project. When I got back to campus that week, I showed

1:43.8

it to all my

1:44.2

linguistics friends, and they thought it was cool. Aw. So in addition to this charming

1:49.3

linguistics crafts anecdote, you've also just talked about embroidering the international phonetic

1:54.2

alphabet in a couple of different grammatical ways. You've said, while I was embroidering the IPA, and then also since I embroidered

2:06.0

the IPA all in a single weekend. So now, both of those actions take place in the past. You have

2:12.3

definitely finished embroidering the IPA by now. It's been years. But there are different ways of considering what the shape

2:20.3

of this same embroiderer action looks like. So I was embroidering the IPA. We're considering this

2:29.5

event as sort of a large blob in which other events can take place, like thinking about each of the sounds

2:35.2

as you're embroidering them.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Gretchen McCulloch and Lauren Gawne, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Gretchen McCulloch and Lauren Gawne and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.