4.4 • 848 Ratings
🗓️ 2 May 2015
⏱️ 66 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | It's Friday, May 1st, 2015, and you're listening to Inquiring Minds. I'm Indra Viscontas. |
0:07.4 | And I'm Kishore Hari. Each week, we bring you a new, in-depth exploration of the space where |
0:11.8 | science, politics, and society collide. We endeavor to find out what's true, what's left to discover, |
0:16.8 | and why it all matters. You can find us online at motherjones.com slash at inquiringshow.tumbler.com or on Twitter at inquiring show and Facebook at |
0:26.9 | inquiring minds podcast. And you can subscribe to the show on iTunes or any other podcasting app. |
0:40.8 | This episode is sponsored by PriVlo. |
0:44.6 | Need a mortgage, but your finances don't fit into a neat little box. |
0:51.1 | PriVlo, P-R-I-V-L-O, a new kind of mortgage lender, takes a holistic view of your finances to see if you qualify, even if you have a one-time credit blemish. |
0:55.7 | Apply at privylo.com slash podcast and fill out a simple online form. You'll have a decision in |
1:01.1 | hours. That's privlo.com slash podcast or call 855-477-4850. Priblo, get home. |
1:15.9 | Pretty much every week we talk about a new study or finding here on Inquiring Minds, |
1:21.8 | and we do that partially because we have a lot of confidence in the system that produces those studies, |
1:27.0 | that there's peer review in place and that those studies have been reviewed by various scientists, |
1:28.9 | editors, and journalists to a certain extent. But every now and again, bad science gets through and gets published. |
1:35.2 | And that poses an interesting dilemma for science. Once the error is found, which is non-trivial |
1:41.8 | to find some of these errors, whether it's intentional or simply |
1:44.8 | just an honest mistake, that's when the retraction process kicks in. But that process in science |
1:50.4 | was largely invisible until recent times. For a long time, you just get a short notice from |
1:55.4 | the journal saying such and such paper has been retracted by the authors, or papers would just disappear altogether with no |
2:02.9 | statement whatsoever. So I called up Ivan Oransky, who founded a blog called Retraction Watch, |
2:09.2 | because he was suspicious of this and thought, it really wasn't benefiting science in any way. |
2:14.4 | Ivan is the editorial director of MedPage and teaches medical journalism at NYU. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Inquiring Minds, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Inquiring Minds and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.