meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Michael Shermer Show

78. Dr. Donald Hoffman — The Case Against Reality: Why Evolution Hid the Truth From Our Eyes

The Michael Shermer Show

Michael Shermer

Dialogue, Science, Reason, Michaelshermer, Natural Sciences, Skeptic

4.4921 Ratings

🗓️ 13 August 2019

⏱️ 104 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In his new book, The Case Against Reality: Why Evolution Hid the Truth From Our Eyes, the U.C. Irvine cognitive scientist Dr. Donald Hoffman challenges the leading scientific theories that claim that our senses report back objective reality. How can it be possible that the world we see is not objective reality? And how can our senses be useful if they are not communicating the truth? Hoffman argues that while we should take our perceptions seriously, we should not take them literally. His evolutionary model contends that natural selection has favored perception that hides the truth and guides us toward useful action, shaping our senses to keep us alive and reproducing. We observe a speeding car and do not walk in front of it; we see mold growing on bread and do not eat it. These impressions, though, are not objective reality. Just like a file icon on a desktop screen is a useful symbol rather than a genuine representation of what a computer file looks like, the objects we see every day are merely icons, allowing us to navigate the world safely and with ease. The real-world implications for this discovery are huge, even dismantling the very notion that spacetime is objective reality. The Case Against Reality dares us to question everything we thought we knew about the world we see.

In this conversation, Hoffman and Shermer get deep into the weeds of:

  • the nature of reality (ontology)
  • how we know anything about reality (epistemology)
  • the possibility that we’re living in a simulation
  • the possibility that we’re just a brain in a vat
  • the problem of other minds (that I’m the only sentient conscious being while everyone else is a zombie)
  • the hard problem of consciousness
  • what it means to ask “what’s it like to be a bat?”
  • does the moon exist if there are no conscious sentient beings anywhere in the universe?
  • is spacetime doomed?
  • quantum physics and consciousness
  • the microtubule theory of consciousness
  • the global workspace theory of consciousness, and
  • how Hoffman’s Interface Theory of Perception differs from Jordan Peterson’s Archetypal Theory of Truth (Shermer’s label for Peterson’s evolutionary theory of truth).

Listen to Science Salon via iTunes, Spotify, Google Play Music, Stitcher, iHeartRadio, TuneIn, and Soundcloud.

You play a vital part in our commitment to promote science and reason. If you enjoy the Science Salon Podcast, please show your support by making a donation, or by becoming a patron.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

As most of you know that our regular listeners we post these once a week on

0:04.1

Tuesdays Tuesdays because our

0:07.7

specialty here is new books mostly science or in general non-fiction books and they're always released on

0:14.0

Tuesdays I have no idea why the publishing industry started doing that but that's

0:18.2

always when new books are released and my book this week is The Case Against Reality, why evolution hid the truth from our eyes by Donald

0:30.0

Hoffman. Donald Hoffman is a professor of cognitive science at the University of California Irvine.

0:35.0

His writing has appeared in Scientific American and Edge and his work has been featured in the Atlantic, Wired, and Quanta.

0:41.0

He resides in Irvine, California.

0:44.0

Hoffman is pretty well known to people now because of his TED Talk,

0:47.3

which has been seen by millions of people on this very subject

0:51.0

on the nature of reality. His is a evolutionary and cognitive science

0:56.0

argument, not a philosophical argument, although much of the book actually but the

1:00.9

last third of the book deals with the nature of reality

1:04.1

really gets into epistemology and ontology and you know pretty much all the great

1:09.6

issues that philosophers discuss it'll be interesting to see how professional philosophers

1:15.9

respond, although you'll hear at the end of the podcast. I ask him about that and

1:19.8

he discusses some of the critiques he's received so far but the book is in much more depth

1:25.4

than his previous paper so we'll see about that I put as many challenges to

1:30.9

him as I could I'm not convinced that his argument is sound, but I think it's a super interesting one that really makes you think about these things and does challenge many of our presumptions assumptions in a way that I think is quite useful.

1:47.2

So I hope you read the book.

1:48.6

As I told them, it's like reading David Deutche's books, kind of mind-blowing in terms of thinking about the

1:54.4

the deepest issues. We do discuss you know the nature of science how it works the

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Michael Shermer, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Michael Shermer and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.