meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Counsel of Trent

#779 - James White's (Non)Response to my Sola Scriptura Arguments

The Counsel of Trent

Catholic Answers

Religion & Spirituality

4.82.4K Ratings

🗓️ 24 July 2023

⏱️ 24 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this episode Trent shows that James White's recent critique of his arguments against sola scriptura have style but lack substance.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the Council of Tren Podcast, a production of Catholic Answers.

0:05.4

Have you ever waited for the big reveal at the end of a movie or a book that just never

0:11.6

showed up?

0:12.8

Disappointing, right?

0:13.8

Well, that's how I felt listening to James White's recent response to my episode that

0:19.1

focused on Soluscriptura and the issue of the Greek word Thaopnustos, often translated

0:25.0

as God-breathe.

0:27.0

That's what we'll be talking about today here on the Council of Tren Podcast.

0:30.8

I'm your host, Catholic Answers Apologist, Tren Horn.

0:34.0

So in my previous episode, I showed that Protestant Apologists over-rely on the Greek word Thaopnustos

0:42.2

in making the case for Soluscriptura in 2 Timothy 316.

0:46.4

They assume it just means God-breathe when other scholars of Arjudic can mean God-breatheing.

0:52.3

They also assume if something is called Thaopnustos in the Apostolic period, that proves

0:57.8

it is a divinely established infallible rule of faith.

1:01.9

But that assumption doesn't hold up when we see that the word was used in the early church

1:06.5

to refer to any spiritually beneficial writing, and the Jews used it to refer to anything

1:11.6

that was divinely life-giving.

1:14.2

For more on that, check out my previous episode.

1:16.8

To put it simply, Protestants overstate their case in taking the fact that Scripture is

1:20.9

called Thaopnustos in 2 Timothy 316, to reach the conclusion that Scripture is unique

1:28.2

in its ability to be an infallible rule of faith, and for anything else to be an infallible

1:33.3

rule of faith, it must also be Thaopnustos.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Catholic Answers, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Catholic Answers and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.