meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Lingthusiasm - A podcast that's enthusiastic about linguistics

69: What we can, must, and should say about modals

Lingthusiasm - A podcast that's enthusiastic about linguistics

Gretchen McCulloch and Lauren Gawne

Science

4.8743 Ratings

🗓️ 16 June 2022

⏱️ 42 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Sometimes, we use language to make definite statements about how the world is. Other times, we get more hypothetical, and talk about how things could be. What can happen. What may occur. What might be the case. What will happen (or would, if only we should have known!) What we must and shall end up with. In other words, we use a part of language known as modals and modality! In this episode, your hosts Lauren Gawne and Gretchen McCulloch get enthusiastic about modals! We talk about the nine common modals in English, the gloriously-named quasimodals (no relation to the bellringer but I would absolutely read the Quasimodo/Quasimodal crossover, I’m just saying), and how people use the ambiguity between permission and believability in English modals for comic effect. We also talk about neat things modals do in various languages: in Nsyilxcen, the modal is a separate word, whereas in Nez Perce, it’s an affix on the verb, and in German, there are also modal adverbs. In Italian Sign Language and American Sign Language the forcefulness of the modal (such as the difference between “should” and “must”) is indicated through having modals that are performed faster or larger or have a more intensive expression in how they’re signed. Announcements: In this month’s bonus episode we get enthusiastic about the word "like"! We talk about why "like" falls prey to the frequency and recency illusions, why linguists get excited about "like" and other function words, and other important dispatches from the world of "like" (apparently people who use "like" are perceived as more attractive!). Join us on Patreon to listen to this and 60+ other bonus episodes. You’ll also get access to the Lingthusiasm Discord server where you can chat with other language nerds! For links to things mentioned in this episode: https://lingthusiasm.com/post/687253856615350272/episode-69-what-we-can-must-and-should-say

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Enthusiasm, a podcast that's enthusiastic about linguistics.

0:22.2

I'm Lauren Gorn.

0:23.3

And I'm Gretchen McCulloch.

0:24.5

And today we're getting enthusiastic about what we can, must, and should say about modals.

0:29.7

But first, our most recent bonus episode was on the different uses of like in English and the very long history of them.

0:36.9

If you'd like to listen to this and all of our other bonus episodes, you can go to

0:40.5

patreon.com slash linkthusiasm.

0:56.5

Can I introduce the topic?

0:59.3

Yes, you may talk about modals.

1:02.2

We probably should introduce modals.

1:05.6

Yeah, we could introduce modals.

1:08.1

We gotta talk about modals.

1:11.4

We must talk about modals. We might be talking about modals already.

1:14.8

We're definitely talking using modals.

1:17.1

They're easy to identify in English because there are nine that are commonly used.

1:21.9

So we have can, could, shall and should, will and would, and the triplet may, might and must.

1:30.8

They're called modals, but you might also know them as modal auxiliaries.

1:34.4

And the thing about modals is they fit in this sort of frame between the subject and then

1:39.1

the verb all by itself in its bare form with no funny business. So you have a sentence like, I can see,

1:46.4

or you may go, and see and go are just in their most unadorned forms. Whereas if you have

1:55.1

something like I want to see or you are going, then you have a two or you have an ing,

2:00.5

or something that's making the verb do other stuff. Whereas modals are going, then you have a two or you have an ing or something that's making

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Gretchen McCulloch and Lauren Gawne, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Gretchen McCulloch and Lauren Gawne and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.