Did Archbishop Carla Maria Vigano recently say that Pope Francis is the Antichrist?

Did he claim that a valid Pope, a successor of St. Peter with full jurisdiction or the

church, could also be the Antichrist?

You might be surprised.

If you're not, there are people out there actually accusing Archbishop Carla Maria Vigano

of these errors.

Now when I did a show last week on Archbishop Vigano when he talks about Rome losing the

faith and becoming the seat of the Antichrist, I said, I'm going to do a follow-up show.

There will be a sequel.

Today is that sequel.

We're going to look at the theology of Antichrist.

As it relates to Rome and the question, could the Antichrist be the Pope?

When I look at St. Paul, the featured text is this one right here on the screen.

Second, Thessalonians 2.4, description of the final eschatological Antichrist, who opposed

it and is lifted up above all things that is called God or that is worshiped so that

he, Sidoth and the Temple of God, showing himself as if he were God and quote, what is

the Temple of God that Paul is referring to?

We'll go through the church follows.

We'll explore St. Jerome, we'll explore St. Augustine, we'll look at Theodorant, we'll look

at St. John Damascus, we'll look at St. Robert Bellerman, and we'll try to answer this

question of could a Pope be an Antichrist, could an Antichrist become a Pope, and then

is it necessary that the Antichrist be in Rome or in Jerusalem in which church fathers

...