meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Theology in the Raw

634: Chris Date Part 2 - Critique on Stand to Reason's Article "Hell Interrupted"

Theology in the Raw

Theology in the Raw

Religion & Spirituality, Christianity

4.61.4K Ratings

🗓️ 12 February 2018

⏱️ 59 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Rethinking Hell Conference is taking place March 9–10, at The Heights Baptist Church in Richardson, Texas. Preston will be there with Chris doing a podcast live! You can find out more at rethinkinghellconference.com. Today on the podcast Preston is talking with Chris Date again from the Rethinking Hell podcast. Preston and Chris are taking this episode to address arguments against the Conditionalist's view of hell raised by Stand to Reason's Greg Koukl and Tim Barnett. The arguments Preston and Chris are addressing are from Part 1 and Part 2 of "Hell Interrupted". Chris is the a host and contributor of the Rethinking Hell Podcast and Blog. Chris seeks to take the Bible seriously and promote rigorous study of the scriptures. You can find the Chris's podcast at rethinkinghell.com. The song at the end is Lazarus by Canopy Climbers. Support Preston Support Preston by going to patreon.com Connect with Preston Follow him on Twitter @PrestonSprinkle Check out his website prestonsprinkle.com If you enjoy the podcast, be sure to leave a review.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Jehovah's Witnesses and Witnesses and

0:06.2

Witnesses are by no means the first people in fairly recent

0:10.9

history to claim Christ and conditional immortality.

0:15.4

They just got it from other Christians. Hello friends and welcome back to another episode of Theology and Ra.

0:37.0

I am back here with my friend Chris Date and if you listen to the previous, you know that Chris and I sort of dialogueed back and forth about the so-called annihilation view of hell, or as we prefer conditionalism or conditional immortality.

0:53.2

So we're gonna, this episode is gonna kind of pick up

0:56.4

on that previous one.

0:57.4

So if you didn't listen to that previous episode,

1:00.0

you might be a little, I wouldn't say lost but this is kind of part two of a two-part

1:06.9

series on the Annilation View of Hell and in this episode we're going to be

1:10.6

primarily addressing some critiques, specifically some critiques

1:14.8

raised by an organization that both Chris and I really like called Stand to Reason

1:20.8

with Greg Kockel and several others who are well-known Christian

1:25.5

apologist and we're going to be working through that document but again if you

1:28.1

if you're unfamiliar with where we have been going then I would I would highly recommend listening to that previous

1:34.4

episode. So with that we'll jump right in. Chris thanks so much for being on the show again.

1:38.7

It's once again my pleasure and honor to be here. So I just want to make clear because this episode is going to be, how do I, I mean it's going to be more, I guess, defensive or

1:50.3

critical in a good way so it could sound argumentative and I just want to say up front I know

1:57.6

Chris you know I know you're gonna echo this but both Chris and I have a deep respect for and love for the ministry of

2:06.9

stand to reason and we just could not speak more highly of what they're doing

2:11.4

as as as Christians, as apologists, as ministers, and we have just a huge

2:19.2

respect for them in their ministry.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Theology in the Raw, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Theology in the Raw and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.