Welcome to points with a quietness episode 56.5. I'm Matt Fred.

Today we'll be doing something a little different. I want to share with you all a debate that I recently participated in.

It was a radio debate on the topic of pornography and I

Engaged with I don't want to say debate because it wasn't so much a formal debate where we each got 20 minutes

You know five minute rebuttals and so forth, but it was certainly a sort of adversarial situation in which I put forth my case

And they disagreed and then I disagreed with why they disagreed and so on and so forth

I chatted with one lady could Charlotte Rose who is I believe a prostitute and a stripper and I'm not else

Not really sure apologies if I got that wrong, but anyway, she says she's a sexual freedom campaigner

I also interviewed at

No, it didn't interview I debated Adam Scarborough of the campaign against censorship

So here's what I want to do in today's podcast. I want to play that debate for you not the entirety of it, but a good chunk of it

If you would like to listen to the full debate, I would strongly suggest that you go to unbelievable

Justin Briley's the host. He's fantastic the shows fantastic if you haven't yet

Subscribe to that podcast you should I'll put a link in the to in the show notes of this podcast so you can check that out

But well, he's what I want to do all right. I want to play this debate

And then I would like to give some concluding thoughts as to how I did

How well they did what I wish I had have said better and those sorts of things a quietness is the champion at

Um, not attacking straw men. He takes his opponents arguments. He takes what's good. He rejects what is false and

Certainly I didn't do that perfectly, but I hope this debate, you know, shows that I did my best to copy a quietness in that regard

Okay, here we go

You

Welcome back to vines with a quietness really excited to get into this debate, but before I do

...