40 Zach Weinersmith - Baby Catapulting and Other Great Terrible Hypotheses

Inquiring Minds

Science, Society & Culture, Neuroscience, Female Host, Interview, Social Sciences, Critical Thinking

4.4 • 848 Ratings

🗓️ 27 June 2014

⏱️ 57 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

There's nothing quite as satisfying as a really good joke. Someone has made a clever new connection between two mundane things that we've all encountered—and suddenly we have a lovely "aha" moment. We find it funny.That sense of revelation accompanying a good joke or comic is very similar to what many scientists experience when they finally figure out a great explanation for some kind of previously unknown phenomenon. But don't take it from us. Take it from the scientifically-trained author and illustrator Zach Weinersmith (née Weiner), creator of the popular webcomic Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal (SMBC), known for its science-themed humor."I suspect what's actually going on with people who are thought of as very creative is they're good at two skills, one of which is generating connections rapidly, and two, editing out the garbage quickly," explains Weinersmith on this week's episode.In Weinersmith's case, some of funniest jokes are actually about just plain bad scientific thinking—and they teach a lesson about what science is, and what it isn't. The comic artist is now one of the main forces behind an event series, entitled the "Festival of Bad Ad Hoc Hypotheses," that specializes in "celebrations of well-argued and thoroughly-researched but completely incorrect evolutionary theory." The winner takes home a sculpture of Charles Darwin, "shrugging skeptically." The first festival took place at MIT in late 2013.On the show this week we talked to Weinersmith about science, comics, and how to make a really great bad hypothesis.This episode also features a short discussion with Cynthia Graber, author of the new PBS/NOVANext article "The Next Green Revolution May Rely on Microbes," and a discussion of the science of why human biting is so dangerous, and of how our hormones influence political choices.iTunes: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/inquiring-minds/id711675943RSS: feeds.feedburner.com/inquiring-mindsStitcher: stitcher.com/podcast/inquiring-mindsSupport the show: https://www.patreon.com/inquiringminds

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	It's Friday, June 27th, and you're listening to Inquiring Minds.
0:05.5	I'm Chris Mooney.
0:06.4	And I'm Indra Viscontas.
0:07.7	Each week we bring you a new, in-depth exploration of the space where science, politics, and society collide.
0:13.1	We endeavor to find out what's true, what's left to discover, and why it all matters.
0:17.2	You can find us on Twitter at Inquiring Show, on Facebook at slash Inquiring Minds podcast,
0:23.7	and you can subscribe to the show on iTunes, on Stitcher, on Swell, or on any other podcasting app.
0:34.1	This episode of Inquiring Minds is sponsored by the great courses, bringing the world's
0:38.3	greatest professors to your fingertips. With over 500 courses on science, history, philosophy, fine arts,
0:44.7	and many other topics, the great courses are available for digital download and streaming or
0:49.1	on DVD and CD. And the best part is that you can listen to or watch the great courses at your own pace,
0:55.0	no homework, no exams. And now for a limited time only, the great courses is giving our listeners
1:00.4	an offer of 80% off the original price of one of its really great courses. This is Stress
1:05.6	and Your Body by Professor Robert Sapolsky. So go to the greatcourses.com slash inquiring minds to find out more. Once again, that's the greatcourses.com
1:14.1	slash inquiring minds. This week, I interviewed comic artist Zach Wienersmith,
1:19.2	whose very popular web comic called Saturday morning breakfast cereal, has a significant
1:24.4	scientific bent. What's more, he's also passionate about teaching us how to
1:28.2	distinguish good from bad science. So one of the things that we talked about was how science actually
1:33.2	works. Here's what he had to say. I feel like there's this unfortunate notion among most people that
1:37.8	what a scientist does is get data and then the data tells them what the conclusion is and that's how
1:42.7	science is done.
1:48.6	And, of course, the actual process is quite a bit messier, which probably makes it more fun,
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Inquiring Minds, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Inquiring Minds and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.