Worried about your future in tech?

Master new skills.

Accelerate your team's impact and redefine what's possible with plural site.

We're more than just another online learning platform.

We're shattering the skills gap and shaping future generations of technologists.

Transform your work. Transform your work.

Transform your team.

Ready to tap in?

Visit us at pluralsight.com to learn more.

This is CBSI on the world.

I'm John Batchel.

The national debate over the militia, sometimes called the National Guard.

I welcome Rob Nadelson, constitutional law professor, senior fellow in constitutional jurors prudence at the Independent Institute in Denver,

author of the original Constitution,

and he is a contributor to the Heritage Foundation's Heritage Guide to the Constitution.

In other words, this is my go-to guy when there's a debate over the Constitution.

Rob, a very good evening to you, Professor.

Thank you.

I plunge you immediately into an argument that you published at the Civitas Outlook for Civitas Institute, the University of Texas at Austin. It has to do with two cases decided in contention with the decision by the President of the United States to call forth the National Guard in certain cities in the West, California, and Oregon in this instance. First was a case the Ninth Circuit ruled Newsom versus Trump.

The second was a case for a federal district judge in early October, Oregon versus Trump.

As I understand, there have been decisions now that mean they're going

in the same direction, agreeing the courts did that the president does have the right to call

...