Worried about your future in tech?

Master new skills.

Accelerate your team's impact and redefine what's possible with plural site.

We're more than just another online learning platform.

We're shattering the skills gap and shaping future generations of technologists.

Transform your work. Transform your work.

Transform your team.

Ready to tap in?

Visit us at plural site.com to learn more.

I'm John Batchel with Professor Rob Nadelson,

and he is helping me understand how tangled this story is about the National Guard, the militia, capital M, in constitutional language.

And Rob, you have recommendations to clear up all of these gray zones as we see the news is going to tumble with a quick reaction for us and who has the

power to send it into states and defining what. You concentrate on the court's duties when and if this

arrives on the doorstep of the overburdened Supreme Court. The one that attracts me most because it requires detail,

the court should uphold the validity of 10 U.S.C. 12406

as a valid exercise of the calling forth clause.

What does that mean, Professor?

Well, what that means is that Congress exercised its power

under the Constitution to authorize the President to use the National Guard

in areas authorized by the Constitution. So I don't think that there's anything wrong with that

statute per se, but you're right in saying that I think some reform is necessary. And by the way,

I'm not alone. I mean, people across the political spectrum, the Brennan Center for Justice,

...