meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast

260. Beyond Order: Rule 1 - Do Not Carelessly Denigrate Social Institutions or Creative Achievement

The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast

DailyWire+

Education, Science, Society & Culture

4.634.5K Ratings

🗓️ 9 June 2022

⏱️ 74 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This compilation showcases clips surrounding Rule 1 from Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life: “Do not carelessly denigrate social institutions or creative achievement.” These conversations feature the likes of Steven Pinker, Theo Von, Jonathan Haidt, Ben Shapiro, and more. We hope you enjoy part 2/14 of this compilation series! —Chapters— [0:00] Rule 1: Beyond Order [2:46] The Rubin Report: An Emotional Return [9:09] Juliette Fogra, Illustrator [16:51] Identity Building, Chaos, & Impact Theory [19:04] Ben Shapiro’s Sunday Special [23:29] This Past Weekend with Theo Von [38:30] The Tim Ferriss Show: Psychedelics & The Bible [42:32] Andrew Doyle Speaks Out [49:12] Steven Pinker & Jonathan Haidt On the Enlightenment [54:08] How to Start the Most Controversial Magazine on the Planet [01:03:58] Cambridge Q&A

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to episode 260 of the JBP Podcast. I'm Michaela Peterson. We've created a compilation

0:07.0

episode for every role in Beyond Order, so this episode discusses Rule 1, do not carelessly

0:13.1

denigrate social institutions or creative achievement, and features Stephen Pinker, Jonathan

0:18.6

Height, Ben Shapiro, and more. I've also released my 150th episode on YouTube featuring my dad.

0:25.8

If you want to check it out, look it up on YouTube. He talks about his response to the recent sports

0:31.6

illustrated cover on there and more. Without further ado, please enjoy Rule 1 of our Beyond Order series.

0:47.5

Rule 1, do not carelessly denigrate social institutions or creative achievement. This paragraph is

1:06.6

from a section entitled, What Should We Point To? It is worth considering deeply just how

1:13.2

necessity limits the universe of viable solutions and implementable plans. First, a plan must in

1:21.8

principle solve some genuine problem. Second, it must appeal to others, often in the face of competing

1:30.1

plans, or those others will not cooperate and might well object. If I value something, therefore,

1:38.0

I must determine how to value it so that others potentially benefit. It cannot just be good for me.

1:46.2

It must be good for me and the people around me. Even that is not enough, which means that there

1:52.6

are even more constraints on how the world must be perceived and acted upon. The manner in which I

1:57.9

view and value the world, integrity associated with the plans I am making, has to work for me,

2:04.0

my family, and the broader community. Furthermore, it needs to work today in a manner that does not

2:11.1

make a worse house of tomorrow, next week, next month, and next year, even the next decade, or

2:17.2

century. A good solution to an important problem must be repeatable without deterioration across

2:25.2

repetitions, iterable in a word, across people, and across time. These universal constraints manifest

2:33.8

biologically and imposed socially reduced the complexity of the world to something approximating

2:39.7

a universally understandable domain of value. This is exceptionally important. Although there are

2:47.5

an unlimited number of problems, as well as an unlimited number of potential solutions,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from DailyWire+, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of DailyWire+ and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.