4.8 • 4.4K Ratings
🗓️ 13 March 2023
⏱️ 72 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Every time our brain does some thinking, there are associated physical processes. In particular, electric currents and charged particles jump between neurons, creating associated electromagnetic fields. These fields can in principle be detected with proper technology, opening the possibility for reading your mind. That technology is currently primitive, but rapidly advancing, and it's not too early to start thinking about legal and ethical consequences when governments and corporations have access to your thoughts. Nita Farahany is a law professor and bioethicist who discusses these issues in her new book, The Battle for Your Brain: Defending the Right to Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology.
Support Mindscape on Patreon.
Nita Farahany received a J.D. and a Ph.D. in philosophy from Duke University. She is currently the Robinson O. Everett Distinguished Professor of Law & Philosophy at Duke, as well as Founding Director of the Duke Initiative for Science & Society. She has served on a number of government commissions, including the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. She is a Fellow of the American Law Institute and of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and was awarded the Duke Law School Distinguished Teaching Award.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hello everyone, welcome to the Mindscape Podcast. I'm your host Sean Carroll. You have the right to remain silent |
0:06.4 | We are told here in the United States |
0:08.8 | This is part of the famous Miranda warning that is given to |
0:12.9 | newly arrested suspects to remind them of some of their rights as |
0:17.2 | Enumerated in the US Constitution especially the Fifth Amendment the right against self-incrimination and |
0:23.2 | This is actually pretty common practice around the world that suspects cannot be forced to testify against |
0:30.0 | themselves is supposed to protect you against |
0:32.4 | Torture or forced confessions anything like that and there's other aspects of |
0:37.6 | rights that we have in the US Constitution and elsewhere that for example very famously in Roe v. Wade the US Supreme Court |
0:46.7 | Said that there was implicitly a right to privacy in the US Constitution given all the enumerated rights |
0:53.9 | It was sensible to say that these added up to a right to privacy |
0:58.7 | Your opinions about that particular judgment may differ |
1:02.5 | But the idea that governments cannot simply see everything we're doing read all of our emails |
1:10.5 | Tap all of our phone conversations etc. It is pretty well entrenched and for good reason |
1:16.2 | But what if the government could just read your mind? |
1:21.7 | What then are the limits that protect our right to privacy if the government could somehow know what you are thinking? |
1:28.4 | That might sound science fictiony, but it's less science fictiony than you might think because the technology is advancing |
1:35.7 | Today's podcast is not going to be primarily about the technology although we'll discuss that |
1:40.8 | It's going to be about the ethical and legal implications of |
1:44.9 | Neuro technology of the idea that we can have brain scanning devices that tell a |
1:51.6 | Listener something about what a person is thinking at different levels of |
1:57.3 | Specificity not even necessarily an implant, but in some cases as we'll hear |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Sean Carroll | Wondery, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Sean Carroll | Wondery and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.