meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The John Batchelor Show

2/2: #Bestof2021: The Taxman always rings twice: 2/2: The New Global Taxman. Richard Epstein, Hoover Institution. (Originally posted June 14, 2021)

The John Batchelor Show

John Batchelor

Society & Culture, Arts, News, Books

4.52.8K Ratings

🗓️ 28 January 2023

⏱️ 11 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Photo: No known restrictions on publication.
The Fox
@Batchelorshow

2/2: #Bestof2021: The Taxman always rings twice: 2/2: The New Global Taxman. Richard Epstein, Hoover Institution. (Originally posted June 14, 2021)
https://www.hoover.org/research/sorting-out-global-tax-mess

The Group of Seven (G-7)—Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States—met last week in Cornwall, England. High on its agenda was establishing basic agreement on three major proposals for remaking the international tax system, whose structure looms ever larger in today’s global economy.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This episode is brought to you by Slack. With Slack, you can bring all your people and

0:05.9

tools together in one place. It's your digital HQ where you can increase productivity,

0:11.1

enable flexibility and automate workflows. Plus, Slack is full of game-changing features

0:16.8

like huddles for quick check-ins or Slack Connect, which helps you connect with partners

0:21.0

inside and outside of your company. Slack, where the future works. Get started at

0:27.0

Slack.com slash DHQ.

0:57.0

I'm asking a question that is transnational. What does this mean about China's large corporations?

1:10.0

Which are certainly competitive? Will we tax them?

1:14.0

You're asking all the right questions to which there are no easy answers. Let's assume

1:20.0

you could do this thing worldwide and the Chinese and the Russians and everybody else is going

1:25.0

to the same pot. What you do is you look at these large corporations and you have to ask

1:30.0

two questions. One is this stuff, result of efficiencies. Two is this stuff, result of restraint

1:36.0

on trade. If it's a result of restraint on trade, then presumably some kind of an antitrust

1:41.0

remedy would be appropriate. But that would not be to the entire firm. It would be with respect

1:46.0

to the particular practices given lines of commerce that might be subject to itself. If you

1:52.0

wish to attack Apple or Google, they engage in a thousand different practices. 988 of them

1:57.0

may be legal and two of them may be wrong. The antitrust solution would pick the two or the

2:02.0

20 of the 50. I turn out to be incorrect and then try to go after them. There's a lot of

2:07.0

difficulty there because there's a kind of wrong kind of mentality around the United

2:12.0

States. The Colbert should build for example in which everybody starts to see antitrust risks

2:17.0

where frankly I don't believe that they exist. But that's a fraction. Now if you want to go with

2:21.0

global remedies and you say, okay, we've got Jeff Bezos, why are we taxing him? When he has huge

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from John Batchelor, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of John Batchelor and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.