4.8 • 4.4K Ratings
🗓️ 21 February 2022
⏱️ 86 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
One of the brilliant achievements of Darwin’s theory of natural selection was to help explain apparently “purposeful” or “designed” aspects of biology in a purely mechanistic theory of unguided evolution. Features are good if they help organisms survive. But should we put organisms at the center of our attention, or the genetic information that governs those features? Arvid Ågren helps us understand the attraction of the “selfish gene” view of evolution, as well as its shortcomings. This biological excursion has deep connections to philosophical issues of levels and emergence.
Support Mindscape on Patreon.
Arvid Ågren received his Ph.D. in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology from the University of Toronto. He is currently a Wenner-Gren Fellow at the Evolutionary Biology Centre at Uppsala University. Previously he worked at Cornell and Harvard. His recent book is The Gene’s-Eye View of Evolution.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hello everyone and welcome to the Mindscape Podcast. I'm your host Sean Carroll. |
0:03.6 | Remember when we talked about the social construction of reality? Wasn't that fun? |
0:08.0 | We contrasted this human scale way of thinking about the world, the social world, |
0:14.0 | where you make up categories and then they're based on what really happens, |
0:18.0 | but there's a lot of freedom there. We contrasted that with the physics level, right, |
0:22.5 | with the electrons and the photons, where it's pretty clear how you want to think about the pieces |
0:28.0 | out of which reality is made. But there are a lot of layers in between the physics level and the social level, |
0:34.0 | the human level, right? There's all a biology, for example. |
0:37.0 | Today we're going to dig into a puzzle, or at least an important research area within biology, |
0:43.0 | that involves exactly this. What is the right way to conceptualize the world of species and populations and evolution? |
0:53.0 | Famously Richard Dawkins in the 1970s popularized a view known as the selfish gene. |
0:59.0 | Back in the old days, in the beginning of the theory of evolution, |
1:03.0 | you might have focused on individual organisms, and imagine that these organisms wanted to reproduce their own genomes, right? |
1:11.0 | They wanted to have kids and have their genetic heritage be passed on to future generations. |
1:17.0 | Then came the math, then came a way of thinking about population genetics that pointed out that you can pass on the genes inside of you, |
1:26.0 | even without you being involved, if all of your relatives are very good at passing on genes. |
1:31.0 | So it became not only Dawkins, but other people point out that it's as if it's the genes that want to pass on their heritage, |
1:39.0 | not the individuals carrying them. In fact, you could say that the individuals are just kind of a bus, full of genes. |
1:46.0 | They're a vehicle that carries on the genes because individuals die, right? |
1:51.0 | Organisms are born, they have a life they die, less than a century for most species, |
1:55.0 | whereas the genes can live on a very, very long time being passed from generation to generation. |
2:01.0 | So surprisingly, not everyone agrees, not so surprisingly, of course. This is a complicated thing. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Sean Carroll | Wondery, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Sean Carroll | Wondery and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.