I am so excited to have any J.M.'s editorial fellowship program as a sponsor for this podcast.

Here from Dr. Sarah Gorey and any J.M editorial fellow on what qualities that would make this

opportunity really aligned. It comes down to three main things. So the first thing I think is,

are you curious? You're the kind of person who's, why do we do that and why don't we do something else?

You know, I think that curiosity is key.

The second thing I think is communication.

Are you passionate about communicating the reason behind what we do, the science, the evidence,

it's communicated clearly that we're accountable, that it's true and it is, you know, the best

quality evidence of being presented because the people who work at the New England Journal of

Medicine are incredibly passionate about making sure that science is accurate and have communicated

in the clearest possible way. And then you're a sponge. Do you want to learn? Do you want to just

sit and soak up the wisdom, the experience,

the knowledge that people have in this environment? So for me, those three things. If you have

those skills, you would really enjoy the fellowship. So if you're curious, have a love of

communication and want to learn as much as possible, the one-year full-time

paid editorial fellowship may be right for you. Check out the show notes for the link and learn more

about the program and the application. Hi everyone. Welcome back to another episode of Hoofebeats.

I'm Cindy Fent and Hospice at NYU. And I'm John Huang,

Cindy's colleague at NYU. We're going to do something a bit different this episode. You will hear

real case presented to you as though we are at the M&N conference. Your first challenge is, as usual,

to diagnose the patient. But your second challenge and the real reason we are here is to

diagnose the physician. Why might they have struggled to think of the right diagnosis in the real

...