4.8 • 4.4K Ratings
🗓️ 24 May 2021
⏱️ 87 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Democracy posits the radical idea that political power and legitimacy should ultimately be found in all of the people, rather than a small group of experts or for that matter arbitrarily-chosen hereditary dynasties. Nevertheless, a good case can be made that the bottom-up and experimental nature of democracy actually makes for better problem-solving in the political arena than other systems. Political theorist Henry Farrell (in collaboration with statistician Cosma Shalizi) has made exactly that case. We discuss the general idea of solving social problems, and compare different kinds of macro-institutions — markets, hierarchies, and democracies — to ask whether democracies aren’t merely politically just, but also an efficient way of generating good ideas.
Support Mindscape on Patreon.
Henry Farrell received his Ph.D. in Government from Georgetown University. He is currently the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Agora Institute Professor of International Affairs at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. He was the 2019 recipient of the Friedrich Schiedel Prize for Politics & Technology. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and co-leader of the Moral Economy of Technology initiative at Stanford University. He is a co-founder of Crooked Timber blog, as well as the Monkey Cage blog at the Washington Post.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hello everybody, welcome to the Mindscape Podcast. I'm your host Sean Carroll and on the podcast we've talked about democracy quite a bit in different contexts |
0:08.3 | We're gonna keep talking about it |
0:09.8 | I think it's very important as well as fascinating topic |
0:12.3 | But usually when you think about democracy when you have a discussion about it |
0:16.4 | There's different angles you can take you can talk about it from a political point of view obviously |
0:21.1 | Historical point of view as we've done philosophical point of view the |
0:25.1 | Justifications for democracy are generally that it's the right thing to do right? |
0:29.9 | It gives voice to the people who are in a country |
0:33.2 | But what about the question of is democracy any good at achieving whatever goals the people in the country actually have? |
0:40.6 | So this is almost a |
0:42.7 | scientific point of view of democracy or at least sort of |
0:45.9 | instrumental |
0:46.9 | computational point of view is |
0:49.1 | Democracy good at problem solving that's the question being asked by today's guest Henry Farrell |
0:54.8 | Now Henry is a well-known political theorist he writes a lot about not just democracy but international relations and so forth |
1:01.3 | But with his collaborator Cosmo Shaleizi |
1:04.0 | He's been thinking about democracy as a problem solving mechanism the cognitive aspects of democracy and |
1:11.1 | Basically what you can do is think about democracy as one kind of |
1:15.7 | Emergence right when we talk about countries we often anthropomorphize them |
1:20.7 | We say this country has these desires or these goals or something like that |
1:24.3 | A little bit sketchy because a country is not a person right but in some sense countries act as if they are |
1:31.9 | Agents that emerge out of all the people who make them up and there's different ways |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Sean Carroll | Wondery, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Sean Carroll | Wondery and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.