meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The John Batchelor Show

1/2: #Bestof2022: The Administrative State awaits Spring: 1/2: #SCOTUS: Even more detail on the definition of "navigable waters" and the Clean Water Act argued before the Court. Richard Epstein, Hoover

The John Batchelor Show

John Batchelor

Society & Culture, Arts, News, Books

4.52.8K Ratings

🗓️ 22 January 2023

⏱️ 13 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Photo: No known restrictions on publication.
Ramshead Lake Wyoming
@Batchelorshow

1/2: #Bestof2022: The Administrative State awaits Spring: 1/2: #SCOTUS: Even more detail on the definition of "navigable waters" and the Clean Water Act argued before the Court. Richard Epstein, Hoover
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/sackett-v-environmental-protection-agency/

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is CBS I in the world. I'm John Badgler, Sacket versus Environmental Protection Agency.

0:10.4

There is Sacket 1, there is Sacket 2, and to choose between them and to understand why

0:15.3

this was argued before the Supreme Court in 2022 and we can expect a decision at best

0:22.0

in 2023 despite the fact that it's been for most of the century a doubt. I welcome Professor

0:29.6

Richard Epstein of the Hoover Institution writing and defining ideas he teaches law at NYU

0:35.0

in the University of Chicago. Richard reading this very carefully as an amateur, I'm struck

0:41.1

by how similar it is to what Dickens made of the chance to record once upon a time in

0:46.4

the 19th century. Once you enter into this tangle of courts and appeals and lengthy discussion

0:54.0

with Amick I Curie filed by distinguished bodies around the country. You are before the court

1:01.3

forever. You are at the court's mercy. This is now 15 years and counting to decide something

1:07.9

that looks commensensically straightforward. We've discussed this before. The Sackets

1:13.6

have a piece of land in Idaho. They want to build a house. It is nearby, priestly, nearby.

1:20.0

I'm using that word in distinctly because there are critical terms here. At some point the

1:27.5

Army Corps of Engineers and other voices observed that the Sackets may be likely in violation of

1:36.6

the EPA's Clean Water Act, may be likely. However, all of this turns on the definition of a few

1:43.6

commonplace words that now are in play, even in 2022, 2023. The word wetlands, what is wetlands?

1:52.3

The word navigable, what does that mean? And the word adjacent. Good evening to you, professor.

1:58.6

Good. It's nice to be here. Yes, there's a lot of open questions about this case.

2:03.0

It is not atypical to see cases that involve land use disputes drag on for well over a decade

2:10.6

because virtually everything that is done by a higher court then goes back to an administrative

2:16.1

agency. There are no rules that are explicitly involved. And so what they do is they require

2:21.6

lower courts and administrators to give intensive, fact specific inquiries about a particular set

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from John Batchelor, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of John Batchelor and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.