meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Church History Matters

049 Consecration in Nauvoo & Utah

Church History Matters

Scripture Central

Religion & Spirituality:christianity, Christianity, Religion & Spirituality

4.92K Ratings

🗓️ 6 February 2024

⏱️ 60 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In his July 1838 tithing revelation, the Lord both affirmed the law of consecration and modified the ongoing way in which the saints were expected to consecrate of their money and property. Rather than following the 1831 system outlined in D&C 42 of legally deeding all of their property to the bishop and receiving back from him a legal lease of property known as a stewardship, the Lord asked the saints instead to follow a tithing system of paying “one-tenth of all their interest annually” (D&C 119:4). Only months after this tithing revelation was received, however, the saints were violently expelled from Missouri and, just over a year later, found themselves as refugees settling a swampy piece of land in Illinois they would call Nauvoo.  In this episode of Church History Matters, we begin by diving into what consecration looked like in Nauvoo and then trace the practice into Utah. And rather than seeing a clean linear break from the D&C 42 financial consecration system of stewardship to the D&C 119 consecration system of tithing, we instead see in the historical record what appears to be various forms of overlap between and hybridization of these two systems. We’re talking about united orders and business cooperatives Brigham City, Orderville, how the federal government broke up these cooperatives, and finally how we as a Church came to settle more exclusively on the tithing system.  For show notes and transcript for this and other episodes go to https://doctrineandcovenantscentral.org/church-history-matters-podcast/

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

In his July 1838 tithing revelation, the Lord both affirmed the law of consecration and

0:12.1

modified the ongoing way in which the Saints were expected to

0:15.8

consecrate of their money and property.

0:18.6

Rather than following the 1831 system outlined in D.N.C. 42, of legally deeding all of their property to the Bishop and receiving

0:25.9

back from him a legal lease of property known as a stewardship.

0:29.4

The Lord asked the Saints instead to follow a tithing system of paying one tenth of all their

0:34.8

interest annually. Only months after this tithing revelation was received the

0:39.7

Saints were violently expelled from Missouri and just over a year later found themselves as refugees settling a swampy piece of land in Illinois they would call Navu.

0:51.0

In today's episode of Church History Matters, we begin by diving into what consecration looked

0:56.7

like in Navu and then trace the practice into Utah.

1:00.6

And rather than seeing a clean, linear break from the DNC 42 financial

1:04.6

consecration system of stewardship to the DNC 119 consecration system of

1:09.0

tithing, we instead see in the historical record what appears to be various forms of overlap between

1:15.4

and hybridization of these two systems.

1:18.8

Today we're talking about United Orders and Business Cooperatives in Brigham City, Orderville, and elsewhere,

1:25.0

and how the federal government broke up these cooperatives.

1:27.8

And finally, how we as a church came to settle more exclusively on the tithing system.

1:32.6

All this and more coming up.

1:34.6

I'm Scott Woodward and my co-host is Casey Griffiths,

1:37.8

and today we dive into our fourth episode of this series,

1:40.7

dealing with consecration and church finance. Now let's get into it.

1:48.6

Hello Casey, what's going on, sir? Not much what's going on with you, Scott.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Scripture Central, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Scripture Central and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.