And we are back, folks, here on the Michigan Insider on the Big 1050WTK and line to

Big 1050.com.

I mentioned in the break a story that was certainly making the rounds on our message board,

making the rounds nationally and highly consequential when it comes to, not just college football,

college athletics in the age of NIL contracts.

How binding our contracts when it comes to a player movement?

You know, will there be a ruling, will there be an outcome that just makes the notion of a contract only in agreement

as far as how much I'm going to pay you? But then if that's the case, why can't you break?

What is then binding in the contract if you could just get up and move? The latest example,

I know we were talking about DeMond Williams, but the latest example of that is another quarterback being sued by his school.

Quarterback Darien Mensa is being sued by Duke for his last minute entry into the transfer

portal. They are claiming breach. The Blue Devils said in their filing,

quote, contracts mean something. Mints's actions violate numerous provisions of his contract with Duke

University and disregard his promises obligations to the university.

And as Mensa agreed when he signed his contract, such breaches caused Duke irreparable harm for

which there is no adequate remedy at law. And in the event of such breach, Duke is entitled

to injunctive or other equitable relief.

And so the battle ensues.

His agency, Young Money, is working with sports attorney, Darien Heiter, our Heitner,

excuse me, and he said in response, and it was a response to our parent company over on the Michigan Insider, said to CBS Sports, the lawsuit shouldn't have been filed in the first place for a variety of reasons.

You can't restrain the movement of athletes from one school to another.

There's no provision in the agreement that removes a requirement that Duke put the player

...