Right is still right, even if you stand by yourself.

Mr. Chief Justice, may it place the card.

Welcome to this week's edition of Case in Point, the legal show for regular people.

I'm your host, Sarah Partial Perry, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C.

Now, this isn't your typical legal show, and I'm not your typical

lawyer. That's because I know that the law can seem really disconnected from everyday life and be,

shocker, just a little boring. That's why case in point is the podcast for you. Our aim is to take

away the mystery shrouding that third branch of government, the courts,

and show you why you should care about legal developments across the country.

On today's episode, we're going to air former SCotus 101 host Zach Smith's impactful event at Heritage.

Just recently, Zach was joined by other top lawyers in the country to give you a bird's eye view of what's up for consideration this term at the biggest court in the land.

The Supreme Court officially opened its term this past Monday and has already granted review in

major cases that are definitely going to grab the headlines. Among those, the court will question

the constitutionality of state bans on so-called gender affirming care for minors. You know,

those children too young to vote by alcohol, sign contracts, register for

the draft or get cigarettes. The court is also going to grant review in a case addressing the

constitutionality of so-called ghost gun laws. We'll address that case later in the season on

case and point. They've also agreed to hear a case concerning whether a state can require proof of age

to limit a minors access to online pornography. And literally just days ago, they granted review

in a case that is going to definitely grab attention. It's the case of an Ohio woman who says she

suffered sex discrimination and sexual orientation discrimination in her

job because she is, drummer will please, a heterosexual woman. That makes her a member of what

...